I'm Leaving MyFitnessPal, What Should I Use? (2026)
For individuals who are choosing to leave MyFitnessPal and are seeking alternatives, Cronometer stands out as the top choice: ±5.2% versus MFP's ±18% MAPE, utilizing an NCCDB-anchored database, approximately 84 nutrients versus 8, $54.95/year for Gold compared to $79.99/year for Premium, beneficial free tier, and ad-free. For those preferring a consumer experience akin to MFP, Lose It is a viable alternative. Nutrola offers a photo-first approach.
Across 16 criteria: MyFitnessPal 4 · Cronometer 10 · Tied 2
Quick Comparison
| Criterion | MyFitnessPal | Cronometer | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (DAI 2026 May validation MAPE) | ±18% | ±5.2% | Cronometer |
| Database verification | Crowd-sourced | NCCDB-anchored | Cronometer |
| Database size | 14M+ | ~1.5M verified | MyFitnessPal |
| Micronutrient depth | 8 (Premium) | ~84 | Cronometer |
| Custom macros (free) | No | Yes | Cronometer |
| Annual price | $79.99 | $54.95 | Cronometer |
| Free tier value | Limited | High | Cronometer |
| Lab biomarker import | No | Yes (Gold) | Cronometer |
| Restaurant menu data | Dense | Limited | MyFitnessPal |
| Exercise tracking | Comprehensive | Lightweight | MyFitnessPal |
| Web app | Mature | Mature | Tie |
| Apple Watch app | Mature | Yes | MyFitnessPal |
| Apple Health sync | Yes | Yes | Tie |
| Recipe import (from MFP) | Native | CSV import | Cronometer |
| Refund policy | App store | 30 days direct | Cronometer |
| Ad-free | Premium only | Free + Gold | Cronometer |
Quick Verdict
Cronometer is our top recommendation for those leaving MyFitnessPal. It offers superior accuracy (±5.2% compared to ±18% MAPE in DAI 2026 May validation), an NCCDB-anchored database, around 84 nutrients versus MFP’s 8, $54.95/year for Gold against $79.99/year for Premium, a helpful free tier, and is ad-free across both tiers. As an alternative, Lose It at $39.99/year provides a familiar consumer experience similar to MFP with improved accuracy. (Another option to consider is Nutrola, a newer photo-first tracker with ±1.2% MAPE, for users willing to embrace a different workflow alongside the platform transition.)
The Decision Tree
If you have made the choice to transition away from MFP, your ideal alternative will depend on the reasons for your decision:
Accuracy concern → Cronometer ($54.95/yr Gold or free, ±5.2% MAPE)
Price concern → Cronometer Free ($0) or Lose It ($39.99/yr)
Database fatigue → Cronometer (NCCDB-anchored, verified entries)
Desire for micronutrient depth → Cronometer (~84 nutrients)
Need for adaptive coaching → MacroFactor ($71.99/yr) or Carbon Diet Coach ($89.99/yr)
Preference for photo-first → Nutrola ($29.99/yr, ±1.2% MAPE)
Desire for MFP-style consumer UX → Lose It ($39.99/yr)
For the majority of users, the most suitable option is Cronometer.
Why Cronometer Wins for Most Users
Accuracy. ±5.2% MAPE, 3.5 times better than MFP. This is the primary distinguishing factor.
Depth. Approximately 84 nutrients available in the free tier. Lab biomarker import available in Gold.
Free tier. Custom macros available without charge, complete diary access, all 84 nutrients. MFP Premium restricts similar features.
Price. $54.95/year for Gold is $25 less than MFP Premium. 30-day refund policy available.
Ad-free. Both tiers of Cronometer are ad-free. MFP free version contains advertisements.
Migration. Cronometer allows MFP CSV imports natively, achieving about 85-90% cleanliness.
Cronometer vs MyFitnessPal: Side-by-Side
Summary: Cronometer excels in accuracy, depth, free tier, pricing, refund policy, ad-free experience, and MFP CSV import. MyFitnessPal leads in database size, restaurant representation, exercise depth, and Apple Watch app maturity.
The difference in accuracy is significant. ±5.2% compared to ±18% MAPE on a 2,000 kcal target indicates about a 100 kcal/day error margin for Cronometer versus 360 kcal/day for MFP. This discrepancy can impact results during a typical 12-week deficit phase, potentially affecting weight loss despite meticulous logging. Additionally, Cronometer’s verified entries mean less need for manual adjustments and fewer cases of encountering multiple fiber values for the same food.
Former MFP users often feel the trade-off of database size acutely in the initial month. Restaurant data tends to be the most pressing issue: Cronometer’s coverage is sparse, and even chain restaurants that are required by the FDA to provide nutrition information are not always included. A common workaround for many former MFP users is to retain MFP free as a secondary reference tool. They search MFP for entries and manually enter the macros into Cronometer. This friction is tangible but typically transforms into a sustainable habit by the fourth week.
Database Comparison
MyFitnessPal boasts over 14M crowd-sourced entries, extensive restaurant coverage, and a mix of verification quality. In contrast, Cronometer offers around 1.5M NCCDB-anchored entries with significantly higher accuracy and complete nutrient profiles. Though the size difference may seem considerable, it often reverses in terms of usefulness for many home-cooked meals. MFP's database is cluttered with duplicate entries, rounding errors on labels, and sometimes missing fiber data. The verified entries in Cronometer greatly alleviate the need for manual corrections.
For users who typically rotate through 30-50 foods, which applies to most individuals, Cronometer’s smaller database effectively meets their actual dietary patterns. However, independent restaurants in major US cities represent the weakest area in Cronometer's coverage. International cuisines, particularly European options, are reasonably well represented in both applications.
Pricing: Real Cost After 12 Months
| MyFitnessPal Premium | Cronometer Gold | Cronometer Free | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual price | $79.99 | $54.95 | $0 |
| Free tier usefulness | Limited | N/A | High |
| Lab biomarker import | No | Yes | No |
| Refund window | App store | 30 days direct | N/A |
| Ad density | Premium-removed (some cross-promo) | None | None |
Cronometer Gold is $25 less expensive annually than MFP Premium. The Cronometer Free tier meets most user needs without requiring payment. The pricing difference is substantial and consistent during renewal periods.
Other Alternatives We Considered
Lose It ($39.99/yr, ±12.4% MAPE), offers MFP-style UX with improved accuracy and a lower price point. Custom macros are available for free. It is a suitable option if you find Cronometer’s interface too complex.
MacroFactor ($71.99/yr, ±6.8% MAPE), features adaptive calorie targets that adjust weekly based on weight trends, and has a polished user experience. There is no free tier. This is ideal for those seeking algorithm-driven coaching without behavioral content.
Nutrola ($29.99/yr, ±1.2% MAPE), is a newer photo-first tracker and has the highest accuracy in the DAI 2026 May validation. It has an NCCDB-anchored database with depth-aware portion AI, representing a different approach from MFP’s database-first model.
Yazio ($40/yr, ±15.5% MAPE), is a solid consumer tracker with a strong European presence, making it a reasonable choice for those looking for a polished mid-tier app at a moderate price.
FatSecret ($19.99/yr Premium Plus, ±17.8% MAPE), is the most affordable paid alternative with decent functionality. Its accuracy is comparable to MFP but at a lower price point.
Migration: How to Switch from MyFitnessPal to Cronometer
- Export from MFP web: Navigate to Settings → Account → Export Data → CSV. A ZIP file will be sent to your email within hours.
- Import to Cronometer: Go to Profile → Account → Import → MyFitnessPal CSV. Select the Servings file.
- Cross-mapping: Roughly 85-90% of entries will map correctly. Custom recipes may require manual adjustments.
- Weight history: Can be transferred via Apple Health if both apps are connected.
- First two weeks: Expect a learning curve with Cronometer’s interface being denser than MFP’s. Most users acclimate within 7-14 days.
Where MyFitnessPal Still Excels
It is important to acknowledge what you may be giving up. MFP retains significant advantages: its 14M+ database provides better coverage for small independent restaurants and niche packaged foods than any other alternative. The exercise tracking capabilities in MFP Premium remain unparalleled in the consumer market, offering detailed cardio and strength tracking that lighter applications do not match. Additionally, the Apple Watch app is more developed than Cronometer’s, featuring quicker entry options. Brand familiarity also plays a role; for users with more than five years of MFP experience, the migration challenges are meaningful.
If your main issue with MFP is something specific, like a bug or missing feature, transitioning to Cronometer may not be necessary. However, if your frustrations stem from accuracy and depth, then switching is advisable.
Who Should Pick Cronometer
- You prioritize accuracy and want an NCCDB-anchored verification system.
- You are interested in tracking micronutrients (calcium, magnesium, vitamin D, B12, iron, zinc, etc.).
- You desire lab biomarker integration in the future (Gold tier).
- You want a valuable free tier and the choice to never pay.
- You prefer a maximum cost of $54.95/year with a 30-day refund policy.
- Your diet consists mostly of home-cooked meals over restaurant dining.
Who Should Pick Lose It
- You prefer MFP-style consumer UX with enhanced accuracy.
- You are looking for $39.99/year Premium pricing.
- You want access to custom macros in the free tier.
- You do not require in-depth micronutrient tracking or lab integration.
- You frequently dine at restaurants and seek a balance between Lose It’s accuracy and the ability to log various foods.
Bottom Line
Cronometer is the best choice for most users. Choose Lose It if you want familiarity with MFP. Opt for Nutrola if you prefer a photo-first approach. Select MacroFactor if adaptive coaching is your goal. Choose one option, commit for 2-3 weeks, and see if it suits you. Align your priorities: for depth and accuracy, choose Cronometer; for familiarity, go with Lose It; for a new workflow, pick Nutrola; and for coaching, choose MacroFactor.
Frequently Asked Questions
Just give me the answer, what should I use?
Cronometer is the best choice for most users due to its superior accuracy, richer data, lower cost, and useful free tier. If you are looking for MFP-style familiarity, choose Lose It. If you prefer a photo-first approach, select Nutrola. Choose one, try it for 2-3 weeks, and see if it fits your needs.
Why Cronometer over MyFitnessPal?
There are six structural advantages: (1) accuracy (±5.2% versus ±18% MAPE); (2) NCCDB-anchored database; (3) ~84 nutrients instead of 8; (4) $54.95 compared to $79.99/year; (5) ad-free experience at both tiers; (6) 30-day refund policy. The trade-off is that MFP still leads in restaurant database breadth.
What if Cronometer's UI is too dense for me?
Lose It at $39.99/year is the closest match in user experience to MFP. It offers cleaner accuracy (±12.4% MAPE), custom macros for free, and is priced at half of the premium cost. However, it lacks the analytical depth found in Cronometer.
What about MacroFactor for adaptive coaching?
MacroFactor at $71.99/year is suitable if you want calorie targets that adjust based on algorithms. It offers ±6.8% MAPE accuracy. There is no free tier and it is slightly more expensive than Cronometer Gold.
What if I want to abandon database-driven tracking entirely?
Nutrola at $29.99/year offers a photo-first tracking approach. It has ±1.2% MAPE in DAI 2026 May validation, making it the most accurate option in that group. It features an NCCDB-anchored database and depth-aware portion AI, all while being ad-free.
Can I migrate my MFP data?
Yes, you can. From the MFP web: navigate to Settings → Account → Export Data → CSV. Cronometer supports MFP CSV imports (Profile → Import → MyFitnessPal CSV); approximately 85-90% will be accurately mapped. Lose It also accepts MFP CSV with some manual mapping needed (around 80-85% accuracy). Nutrola allows CSV imports for historical data (about 75% accuracy).
Will I miss MFP's restaurant database?
Most likely, yes, to some extent. None of the alternatives at Cronometer's level match the breadth of MFP's restaurant database. A workaround is to keep MFP free as a secondary lookup tool for restaurants while logging your primary data in your new application.
Editorial standards. See our scoring methodology and editorial policy. We accept no sponsored placements.